GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · public rank 2
Overall 84.2
Coding 71
Agentic 76.2
$/M $2 / $10
AI Model Watch
All About Claude Opus 5.5
Current public winner: Claude Opus 5.5 with an overall score of 86.7. Public #2: GPT-6.1 Sol.
Public models only
Claude Opus 5.5 is the current public frontier-model leader in the live benchmark snapshot. Restricted-access rows move to the unreleased watch page and unknown availability is withheld, so this dossier can show the public #1, public #2, category scores, costs, and nearest challengers. Updated 2026-10-22.
Updated 2026-10-22
Public #1
86.7
Public rank 1 in the current snapshot.
Public #2
GPT-6.1 Sol
Overall 84.2 · rank 2.
Coding
82.7
#2 on the coding signal.
Cost per task
$1
Estimate for 100K input + 30K output tokens; tools, retries, and cache excluded.
Daily verdict
Claude Opus 5.5 is the public model to inspect first
That does not make it the best model for every job. It means the public side of the benchmark feed currently says it deserves the first serious look.
What the scoreboard is really saying
Claude Opus 5.5 leads this live public comparison with an overall score of 86.7 and a coding score of 82.7, plus an agentic score of 90.4.
Read that as a selection signal, not a guarantee. The model still needs to be tested on your repo, your tools, your risk posture, and your budget. The public score is the shortlist; the task result is the decision.
Public #2 is GPT-6.1 Sol with an overall score of 84.2.
Restricted-access rows are handled separately so they do not distort the public-model answer. View the unreleased watch page.
There is a real tie signal in the current data. If another model shares the top category score, the tiebreak comes from public rank, overall score, and how much the category actually matters for the work.
Model card
Creator
Anthropic
Access
Public
Context
1M
Reasoning
#4 · 86.1
Input $/M
$4
Output $/M
$20
Scoreboard
Where it wins, ties, and gets challenged
A useful model page should show the public model and the field around it. The nearest rivals matter because ties and narrow gaps are where local testing changes the answer.
Overall leaders
#1
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · dossier model
86.7
#2
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
84.2
#3
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
84
#4
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
83.3
#5
Gemini 4 Argon
82.9
Coding leaders
#1
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
84.3
#2
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · dossier model
82.7
#3
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
76.8
#4
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
75.5
#5
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
74.3
Agentic leaders
#1
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · dossier model
90.4
#2
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
80.8
#3
Gemini 4 Argon
78.7
#4
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
78.4
#5
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
76.2
Reasoning leaders
#1
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
93.3
#2
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
90.5
#3
Gemini 4 Argon
86.9
#4
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · dossier model
86.1
#5
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
85.2
The field
Closest public rivals
These are the nearby public rows after restricted-access and unknown-availability models are withheld.
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI · public rank 3
Overall 84
Coding 75.5
Agentic 75.1
$/M $10 / $50
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · public rank 4
Overall 83.3
Coding 76.8
Agentic 80.8
$/M $10 / $50
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · public rank 5
Overall 82.9
Coding 73
Agentic 78.7
$/M $2 / $10
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic · public rank 6
Overall 82.3
Coding 84.3
Agentic 69.1
$/M $2 / $10
Use it well
How to turn a winner into a decision
The live winner is the beginning of evaluation, not the end.
Use the public rank to shortlist
Start with the public leader and closest rivals. Do not spend local eval time on every model when the public field already narrows the search.
Use local tests to decide
Run the winner against your repo, RAG corpus, browser workflow, security posture, and cost envelope. Public benchmarks cannot see your failure modes.
Use cost per completed task
Token price is only useful after retries, output length, long context, tool calls, latency, and human correction are counted.
FAQ
Quick answers
What does best frontier model today mean?
It means the current benchmark leader among models with evidence of broad public access. Restricted and unknown-availability rows are excluded. It is a daily shortlist signal, not a permanent recommendation.
Where do preview models go?
A public preview stays on this page; the label alone does not prove restricted access. Models with verified partner-only or private access go to the unreleased watch page. Unknown availability is withheld.
Can the top model change without this page being redeployed?
Yes when the route is served through the app-server SSR path or when the browser hydrates from the live public feeds. Static source HTML remains the fallback until this page is moved behind the SSR origin.
Why can one model be best overall while another is best for coding?
Overall score averages broad public signals. Coding, agentic workflow, reasoning, context, and cost can move independently, so a model can be the overall leader while a different model is the better choice for a narrow job.
Should cost decide the winner?
Only for cost-sensitive workloads. Token price matters after accounting for context length, output length, retries, tool calls, cached input, latency, and human correction. The cheapest model can become expensive if it fails the task.
Inspect first
Sources
- BenchLM public leaderboard endpoint
- BenchLM public pricing endpoint
- Models.dev model database
- LLM model benchmarks guide
- Claude vs ChatGPT vs Gemini comparison
- LMArena Leaderboard
- SWE-bench repository
- Terminal-Bench 2.1
Third-party data note: live rows come from public benchmark and pricing feeds, not internal Dreamers testing. Restricted-access and unknown-availability rows are excluded from public leaders; public previews remain public. Cost per task estimates use 100K input and 30K output tokens; tools, retries, cache, and failed attempts are excluded.