AI Fact Checking Engine

We specialize in

We are

scientists and builders who understand how things work under the hood and deliver high-performing products built to hold up at scale.

Building in these domains requires deep infrastructure. Our work routinely involves high-performance computing, GPU systems, and hands-on cybersecurity. We know these systems because we've built them from the ground up. We are aware of, and building, the cutting edge in emergent technology from week to week.

Work

HyperCite

AI Fact Checking Engine

What HyperCite Has to Say Check Them Out

AI chat is something we all use, and hallucinations are something many of us have been frustrated by. We built a cross-disciplinary fact-checking engine for science, medicine, law, and defense that verifies claims against underlying sources instead of letting unsupported text slide by unchallenged. The software is being built to help the Supreme Court of Arizona and is currently trusted in work with the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two. Correct information matters differently depending on the field, but the pattern is the same. In law, a bad citation can distort an argument. In medicine, a confident falsehood can harm a patient. In science, weak grounding can send research in the wrong direction. In defense, inaccurate information can become an operational risk. A probabilistic system will never be perfect, but that does not mean teams have to accept vague answers. Good systems can define approved sources, retrieve the right evidence, compare claims against that evidence, and show people exactly where a conclusion came from. We approached HyperCite as citation-grounded AI: source traceability, claim matching, strong guardrails, and a genuinely hallucination-resistant retrieval workflow. Under the hood, that means intelligent embeddings systems, state-of-the-art RAG, source-aware evaluation, and data pipelines that create rigorous test sets instead of relying on vibes. The goal is simple enough for anyone to understand: if a model makes a claim, it should be able to show its work. The technical challenge is making that simple idea hold up in messy real documents. Claims need to be broken into checkable units. Sources need to be chunked, embedded, retrieved, and ranked. Matches need to be evaluated against real criteria: citation coverage, retrieval quality, contradiction detection, missing-evidence handling, and whether the answer is useful without pretending to know more than the sources support. That is how the product checks facts, fights hallucinations, and makes AI safer in truth-critical domains.

Listen
Think
Build

The critical beginning to any successful project, is alignment between people with vision and the people building. We have the experience to ask, to listen, and to execute in a way that serves the actual objective in front of the tasks themselves.

Our approach involves curiosity for how things work from first principles, and deep respect for the scientific method. We have been shipping execution of ambitious ideas for well over a decade.

You have ideas.

Let's face it. Having a capable technical partner requires trust in responsibility, especially when technology moves this fast. We do what we do so you can focus on what you do best.